MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896569878 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2875486

Optimal Design of a Two-Stage Wyner-Ziv Scalar Quantizer With Forwardly/Reversely Degraded Side Information

2018· article· en· W2896569878 on OpenAlexafffund
Qixue Zheng, Sorina Dumitrescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlphabetAlgorithmMinificationScalar (mathematics)Directed acyclic graphDynamic programmingSource codePartition (number theory)MathematicsProperty (philosophy)Optimization problemEncoderComputer scienceMathematical optimizationDiscrete mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the optimal design of a two-stage Wyner-Ziv scalar quantizer with forwardly or reversely degraded side information (SI) for finite-alphabet sources and SI. We assume that the binning is performed optimally and address the design of the quantizer partitions. The optimization problem is formulated as the minimization of a weighted sum of distortions and rates. The proposed solution is globally optimal when the cells in each partition are contiguous. The solution algorithm is based on solving the single-source or the all-pairs minimum-weight path (MWP) problem in certain weighted directed acyclic graphs. When the conventional dynamic programming technique is used to solve the underlying MWP problems, the time complexity achieved is O(N <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> ), where N is the size of the source alphabet. A so-called partial Monge property is additionally introduced, and a faster solution algorithm exploiting this property is proposed. Experimental results assess the practical performance of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207