MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896589148 · doi:10.1109/imws-5g.2018.8484696

Analysis and Exploitation of Diplexer-based Fully Passive Harmonic Transponder for 5G Applications

2018· preprint· en· W2896589148 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoqiang Gu, Lei Guo, Simon Hemour, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplexerTransponder (aeronautics)HarmonicElectronic engineeringDiodePower (physics)SpiceHarmonic analysisComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Total harmonic distortionEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical model for the conversion loss (CL) calculation of diode-based fully passive harmonic transponders is proposed in this work. Given diode's SPICE parameters, the proposed model can accurately predict second-harmonic output based on RF input power. Thus, CL can be easily obtained. Such an accurate analytical model can be applied to evaluating potential CL performance of each diode candidate. Then, a novel diplexer-based fully passive harmonic transponder is designed, prototyped and measured. Through the introduction of the diplexer, traditional stringent antenna design restrictions can be alleviated. For an input power level of -30 dBm, measured CL of the proposed harmonic transponder is around 20.2 dB, which is more than 10 dB lower than the state-of-the-art counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207