MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 12227: New Insights Into Calcification and Aortic Stenosis Using 4-dimensional Computed Tomography.

2016· article· en· W2896631158 on OpenAlexaff
William Jenkins, Louis Simard, Jérôme Hourdain, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Maurice Enriquez‐Sarano

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyStenosisCalcificationRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Aortic Valve Calcification (AVC) is intrinsic to aortic stenosis (AS). While established concepts assume homogeneous calcification causing AS, wide variability in hemodynamic severity at any given AVC burden suggests other operative mechanisms. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) now accurately measures global AVC, but AVC spatial distribution remains elusive due to imaging orientation. Methods and Results: We developed ‘en-face’ imaging by re-registration of 4D-MDCT to quantify AVC spatial distribution and analyzed global AVC load and AVC distribution in 418 patients with AS (76±9 years; mean gradient 35±17 mmHg). 4D-volume-rendered MDCT datasets were re-oriented to en-face view of aortic valve for AVC spatial scoring with individual cusp calcification load, cusp-edge calcification and AVC asymmetry. Despite high total AVC load (450 [250-666] AU/cm 2 ), asymmetry was frequent (50%), with a difference between most- and least-calcified cusp of 112 [66-182] AU/cm 2 . Maximum AVC was in the non-coronary cusp in 61% (p<0.001). Cusp edge calcification was none-mild in 26%, moderate in 62% and severe in 12%. Adjusting for total AVC, severe AS (mean gradient >40 mmHg) was more likely with symmetrical AVC (odds ratio [OR] 2.36, p<0.001) and with edge calcification moderate (OR 4.16, p=0.001 vs none-mild) to severe (OR 10.7, p=0.001). Inclusion of AVC distribution improved models predicting AS severity over total AVC (p<0.001). Conclusions: Four-dimensional MDCT en-face re-registration and AVC quantitation provides new insight into AS pathophysiology. Contrary to classical concepts, AVC is frequently inhomogeneous and asymmetric. Hemodynamic AS severity is independently affected not only by global AVC but also by variations in AVC distribution and location within cusps, emphasizing the importance of 4D AVC assessment in AS. Impact of quantified AVC asymmetry and location on outcome of transcutaneous aortic valve replacement should be evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207