MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896709194 · doi:10.2351/1.5062940

System identification and height control of laser cladding using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems

2013· article· en· W2896709194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemControl theory (sociology)Neuro-fuzzyController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemComputer scienceControl systemAdaptive controlArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringFuzzy logicEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) are utilized to identify and control the clad height in the laser cladding process. The scanning speed of the substrate is used as the control action in the controller. A feedback signal is obtained using a CCD camera. First, the process is identified by means of an ANFIS network through a hybrid learning algorithm. The inverse dynamics of the ANFIS plant is later obtained in an ANFIS inverse learning scheme. The inverse dynamics is used in a neuro-fuzzy structure to obtain an ANFIS controller for the process. A complete control system is designed by tuning the ANFIS controller as a combined unit. Satisfactory results are obtained both in process modeling and process control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it