MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896709194 · doi:10.2351/1.5062940

System identification and height control of laser cladding using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems

2013· article· en· W2896709194 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Hossein Farshidianfar, Amir Khajepour, Meysar Ƶeinali, Adrian Gelrich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemControl theory (sociology)Neuro-fuzzyController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemComputer scienceControl systemAdaptive controlArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringFuzzy logicEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) are utilized to identify and control the clad height in the laser cladding process. The scanning speed of the substrate is used as the control action in the controller. A feedback signal is obtained using a CCD camera. First, the process is identified by means of an ANFIS network through a hybrid learning algorithm. The inverse dynamics of the ANFIS plant is later obtained in an ANFIS inverse learning scheme. The inverse dynamics is used in a neuro-fuzzy structure to obtain an ANFIS controller for the process. A complete control system is designed by tuning the ANFIS controller as a combined unit. Satisfactory results are obtained both in process modeling and process control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207