MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896714202 · doi:10.1063/1.5038038

Reservoir computing with a single delay-coupled non-linear mechanical oscillator

2018· article· en· W2896714202 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Dion, Salim Mejaouri, Julien Sylvestre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec
KeywordsReservoir computingBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceNonlinear systemLinearityMultiplexingMicroelectromechanical systemsComputer engineeringElectronic engineeringArtificial neural networkMaterials scienceEngineeringOptoelectronicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysicsGeologyRecurrent neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reservoir computing was achieved by constructing a network of virtual nodes multiplexed in time and sharing a single silicon beam exhibiting a classical Duffing non-linearity as the source of nonlinearity. The delay-coupled electromechanical system performed well on time series classification tasks, with error rates below 0.1% for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order parity benchmarks and an accuracy of (78±2)% for the TI-46 spoken word recognition benchmark. As a first demonstration of reservoir computing using a non-linear mass-spring system in MEMS, this result paves the way to the creation of a new class of compact devices combining the functions of sensing and computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207