MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896730462 · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2875447

Induction Motor Stator Current AM-FM Model and Demodulation Analysis for Planetary Gearbox Fault Diagnosis

2018· article· en· W2896730462 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhipeng Feng, Xiaowang Chen, Ming J. Zuo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDemodulationSidebandStatorFault (geology)Induction motorControl theory (sociology)Frequency modulationHarmonic analysisEngineeringTorqueSIGNAL (programming language)Rotor (electric)Amplitude modulationElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringRadio frequencyVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induction motor-planetary gearbox drivetrains are widely used for industrial productions, including machine tools in manufacturing systems. For fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes in such electromechanical systems, motor current signal analysis provides an effective alternative approach, because motor current signals have easier accessibility and are free from time-varying transfer path effects. Planetary gearbox faults generate load torque oscillations, leading to both amplitude modulation and frequency modulation (AM-FM) effects on induction motor current signals. To thoroughly understand gear fault features in current signals, an AM-FM current signal model is derived through mechanical-magnetic-electric interaction analysis, explicit equation of Fourier spectrum is derived, and sidebands characteristics are summarized. To avoid an intricate sideband analysis, amplitude and frequency demodulation analyses are proposed, explicit equations of corresponding demodulated spectra are derived, and gear fault features are summarized. The theoretical derivations are validated through lab experiments. Localized fault on the sun, planet, and ring gears are all successfully diagnosed using the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207