A phase II, multicenter study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in adults (rhabdoid tumor cohort) (NCT02601950)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs), including small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and thoracic sarcoma (TS; distinct, aggressive SMARCA4 negative tumors with rhabdoid features), are highly aggressive with limited response to conventional systemic therapy. Dysfunction of the SWI/SNF complex, due to loss of INI1 or SMARCA4, leads to oncogenic dependence on EZH2 through transcriptional repression caused by aberrant H3K27me3. Tazemetostat, a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of EZH2, demonstrated antitumor activity in both INI1 and SMARCA4-negative preclinical models. Methods: Tazemetostat (800 mg BID) was studied in adults with MRT (confirmed by histology and INI1 loss) in this phase 2 multicenter, open-label, single arm, 2-stage Green-Dahlberg design study. Futility assessment was performed at stage 1 after the first 15 pts completed ≥24-weeks dosing, the final study visit, or terminated early. Success at stage 1 required ≥1 pt achieving a PR or CR. Stage 2 success required confirmed PR or CR in ≥ 5 treated pts. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Key secondary endpoints included safety/tolerability. Results: With enrollment complete (N = 31; median age of 32 years; 58% female; n = 10 SCCOHT; n = 10 TS; n = 11 other INI1-neg tumors), futility was passed for stage 1, but not for stage 2. There were a total of 2/31 PRs; 1 pt with SCCOHT with a duration of response of 32 weeks and 1 pt with TS with an ongoing response at 8 weeks. Stable disease as best overall response was observed in 7 (23%) pts. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild. Vomiting (42%), nausea (32%), cancer pain (26%), fatigue (23%), and abdominal pain (23%) were the most frequently reported AEs of any grade. Grade ≥3 AEs, regardless of relationship to study drug, included: death (19%; not treatment-related), anemia (16%), and abdominal pain (10%). No pts discontinued due to treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: Tazemetostat demonstrated clinical activity in 2 difficult to treat tumors (SCCOHT and TS), with generally mild to moderate AEs. Although stage 2 futility was not passed, further understanding of the heterogeneity of these highly aggressive tumors may help to build upon the PR seen in 2 pts. Clinical trial identification: NCT02601950. Editorial acknowledgement: Third-party writing assistance was provided by Katie Crosslin, PhD, and Andrea Eckhart, PhD, of Ashfield Healthcare Communications (a UDG Healthcare plc company), and supported by Epizyme, Inc. Legal entity responsible for the study: Epizyme, Inc. Funding: Epizyme, Inc. Disclosure: R.L. Jones: Consultant: Adaptimmune, Blueprint, Clinigen, Eisai, Epizyme, Daichii, Deciphera, Immunedesign, Lilly, Merck, PharmaMar. M. Agulnik: Consulting/Advisory: Janssen, Eisai, Novartis, Lilly; Speakers' bureau: Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb. R. Chugh: Research funding: Epizyme; Scientific advisor/consultant: Epizyme. O. Mir: Consultancy: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Lundbeck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Vifor. Board membership: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Vifor; Speakers’ bureau: Eli Lilly, Roche, Servie; Stock ownership: Amplitude Surgical, Transgene. Employee: Gustave Roussy. A. Italiano: Advisory board consulting: Epizyme. T. Jahan: Research funding: Aduro Biotech, Acerta Pharma, Aztrazeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kadmon, BMS, Polaris, Epizyme. G.D.D. Demetri: Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen Oncology, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, AbbVie, Epizyme, Adaptimmune - Research support to Dana-Farber for GD as PI in clinical trial agreements in DFCI sarcoma unit; Novartis, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Sanofi Oncology, Janssen Oncology, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Epizyme, PharmaMar, Daiichi-Sankyo, WIRB Copernicus Group, ZioPharm, Polaris Pharmaceuticals - consultant/fees; Novartis - patent licensed from Dana-Farber with royalty paid to Dana-Farber; Blueprint Medicines, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals - Member, board of directors, member, scientific advisory board; Blueprint Medicines, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, G1, Caris Life Sciences, Champions Oncology - consultant advisory board, consulting fees and equity (minor stake, public or non-public); Bessor Pharmaceuticals - consultant, equity (minor stake, non-public) M. Roche, I. Sapir, S. Daigle, A. Clawson: Paid employee and stock with Epizyme. M. Gounder: Paid consultant and board member for Epizyme Medical Advisory Board Karyopharm – advisory board and honorarium Daiichi – advisory board and honorarium TRACON – honorarium Amgen – honorarium. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".