MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896773320 · doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1532068

Service encounter interactions of people living with moderate-to-severe post-stroke aphasia in their community

2018· article· en· W2896773320 on OpenAlexafffund
Carole Anglade, Guylaine Le Dorze, Claire Croteau

Bibliographic record

VenueAphasiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxUniversité de MontréalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
KeywordsAphasiaConversationService (business)PsychologyDatabase transactionPaymentStroke (engine)AdvertisingBusinessCommunicationComputer scienceMarketingEngineeringCognitive psychologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Access to the community is recognised as a need as well as a right for people living with a disability, including people living with aphasia (PLWA). Although studies have shown factors that hinder or support participation of PLWA, few examined naturally occurring interactions outside the home.Aims: This qualitative study aimed to describe the structure of natural interactions occurring between people with aphasia and individuals at the checkout in service encounters.Methods and Procedure: Six participants with moderate-to-severe expressive post-stroke aphasia were video-recorded during commercial interactions within their community environment. Data collection took place in grocery stores, supermarkets, restaurants, drug stores, coffee shops, specialised shops, and a movie theatre. A total of 20 commercial interactions were analysed using conversation analysis.Outcomes and Results: The interactions between PLWA and checkout assistants during payment were characterised by a sequence of four communication stages based on mutual agreement of (1) their availability for the commercial transaction, (2) the item(s) that would be purchased, (3) the price, and (4) the fact that the interaction was over. The second and third parts of the sequence were more challenging in terms of physical access to the desired item(s) or its representation in stage two and access to a visual display of the price in stage three influenced the communication accessibility of the stores.Conclusions: The present findings suggest that PLWA can successfully participate in interactions involving the purchase of goods, even if aphasia is severe, as these interactions are structured by communication and four stages of mutual agreement. During rehabilitation, speech–language pathologists could help prepare PLWA to carry out commercial transactions in self-selected shops to support active community participation post-rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAphasiologySame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207