El complejo Guazapa en El Salvador: La diáspora tolteca y las migraciones pipiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el siguiente articulo se presentan las evidencias arqueológicas de un grupo de asentamientos prehispánicos ubicados en las zonas occidental y central de El Salvador que fueron ocupados durante el período postclásico temprano (900-1200 d.C.). El autor planea demostrar que la cultura material de estos sitios tiene su origen en el México central, en sitios de filiación tolteca , además exponer que los principales habitantes de estos sitios fueron grupos de habla náhuat que emigraron de México hacia Centroamérica como parte de la «diáspora tolteca», una secuencia de movimientos poblacionales que ocurrieron durante los últimos siglos de la época prehispánica [Fowler 1989a: 32-49, 1989b, 1989c, 1995: 144-164, 2001]. Por otra parte se vincula el complejo Guazapa de El Salvador y las primeras migraciones pipiles principalmente con el colapso de Tula Chico , el autor a través de la investigación, propone que grupos de habla náhuat abandonaron y fueron expulsados de Tollan al final de la fase Corral y concluye que el mundo tolteca en el postclásico temprano se extendió hacia los fértiles y populosos valles del occidente y centro de El Salvador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".