MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896789473 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.044304

Evolution from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math>-soft to stable triaxiality in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Nd</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> as a prerequisite of chirality

2018· article· lv· W2896789473 on OpenAlexaff
B. F. Lv, C. M. Petrache, A. Astier, E. Dupont, А. Лопез-Мартенс, P. T. Greenlees, H. Badran, T. Calverley, D. M. Cox, T. Grahn, J. Hilton, R. Julin, S. Juutinen, J. Konki, M. Leino, J. Pakarinen, P. Papadakis, J. Partanen, P. Rahkila, M. Sandzelius, J. Sarén, C. Scholey, J. Sorri, S. Stolze, J. Uusitalo, A. Herzáň, B. Cederwall, A. Ertoprak, H. Liu, S. Guo, M. L. Liu, Y. H. Qiang, J. G. Wang, Xin‐Hui Zhou, I. Kuti, J. Timár, A. Tucholski, J. Srebrny, C. Andreoiu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaChina Scholarship CouncilNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVNarodowe Centrum NaukiNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeVetenskapsrådetAcademy of FinlandNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The level structure of $^{136}\mathrm{Nd}$ has been investigated using the $^{100}\mathrm{Mo}(^{40}\mathrm{Ar},4n)$ reaction and the JUROGAM II+RITU+GREAT setup. The level scheme has been extended significantly. Many new bands have been identified both at low and high spin, among which are five nearly degenerate bands interpreted as chiral partners. Excitation energies, spins, and parities of the previously known bands are revised and firmly established, and some previously known bands have been revised. Configurations are assigned to the observed bands based on cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky calculations. The band structure of $^{136}\mathrm{Nd}$ is now clarified and the various types of single-particle and collective excitations are well understood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207