MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O ENSINO DE LÓGICA ARTISTOTÉLICA NO ENSINO MÉDIO: UMA ABORDAGEM METODOLÓGICA SEGUNDO REFERENCIAIS VYGOTSKIANOS

2018· article· pt· W2896818060 on OpenAlexaff
Amauri Carboni Bitencourt, Solange Aparecida de Oliveira Hoeller

Bibliographic record

VenueAtos de Pesquisa em Educação · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lógica aristotélica é uma maneira de melhorarmos as formas de raciocínio, tanto da escrita quanto da oral. Abordamos este tema nos terceiros anos do ensino médio integrado de um Instituto Federal, mais especificamente nos cursos de Agropecuária, em 2015 e 2016. O objetivo foi possibilitar ao educando refletir, argumentar, escrever e falar de modo mais eficaz. Para tanto, consideramos como abordagem metodológica alguns referenciais da teoria vygotskiana (funções psicológicas superiores e a internalização destas; conceitos espontâneos e conceitos científicos; a mediação e a interação). O ensino de lógica aristotélica no ensino médio pode ser abordado segundo os referenciais teóricos tomados, pois permitem tratar e aprimorar o pensamento lógico formal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtos de Pesquisa em EducaçãoSame topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207