MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896888018 · doi:10.3917/ctf.061.0055

L’exposition des enfants au conflit sévère de séparation. Les défis particuliers pour la pratique en protection au Québec

2018· article· fr· W2896888018 on OpenAlexaffabout
Claire Malo, Myriam Morin, Jacques Moreau, Sonia Hélie, Chantal Lavergne

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers critiques de thérapie familiale et de pratiques de réseaux · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, c’est depuis 2007 que la loi québécoise sur la protection de la jeunesse inclut les mauvais traitements psychologiques (MTP) comme motif recevable de signalement. Dans les trois ans ayant suivi cette inclusion, un premier portrait québécois montre que la vaste majorité des situations de MTP retenue pour évaluation implique une exposition de l’enfant à la violence conjugale ou à un conflit sévère entre ses parents séparés. Ce dernier type de situation pose des défis particuliers pour les intervenants en protection. Le présent article présente brièvement le système de protection québécois et la littérature recensée sur l’exposition des enfants au conflit sévère de séparation, avant d’illustrer à l’aide d’histoires de cas les principaux défis posés par cette problématique pour la pratique en protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers critiques de thérapie familiale et de pratiques de réseauxSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207