MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896936894 · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30301-7

Factors affecting local regrowth after watch and wait for patients with a clinical complete response following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer (InterCoRe consortium): an individual participant data meta-analysis

2018· review· en· W2896936894 on OpenAlexaff
Sami A. Chadi, Lee Malcomson, Joie Ensor, Richard D Riley, Carlos Vaccaro, Gustavo Rossi, I. R. Daniels, Neil Smart, M. Osborne, Geerard L. Beets, Monique Maas, Danielle S. Bitterman, Kevin Du, Simon Gollins, Arthur Sun Myint, F. M. Smith, Mark Saunders, Nigel Scott, Sarah O’Dwyer, Rodrigo Otávio Araújo, Marcus Valadão, Alberto Lopes, Cheng-Wen Hsiao, Chien-Liang Lai, Radhika Smith, Emily Carter Paulson, Ane Appelt, Anders Jakobsen, Steven D. Wexner, Angelita Habr‐Gama, Guilherme Pagin São Julião, Rodrigo Oliva Perez, Andrew G. Renehan

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersManchester Biomedical Research CentreNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMeta-analysisChemoradiotherapyColorectal cancerMedicineCancerOncologyMedical physicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.015
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.389
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.063 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations189
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologySame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207