Study on creep performance of launch canister under long-term storage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the creep performance of a multi-barrel rocket launch canister under long-term stacking storage is studied. Based on the Bailey–Norton model, a creep model for the frame material of a launch canister was established. Constant stress tensile creep tests under different stress levels at room temperature were carried out on the frame materials of the launch canister and the creep model parameters were obtained by test data fitting. The three-dimensional finite element model of the launch canister was established in the ABAQUS software environment and the creep deformation of the launch canister after long-term stacking storage was studied. The results indicated that the bottom layer of the launch canister frame presented an extended residual deformation when the stacking storage solution with the original support pad was used. Therefore, a position adjustment program of the support pad was put forward. The residual deformation of the launch canister frame after long-term storage could be significantly reduced, thus the performance requirements for the launch canister are guaranteed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it