MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897182992 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.155115

Using coherent phonons for ultrafast control of the Dirac node of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>SrMnSb</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2897182992 on OpenAlexaff
C. Weber, Madison G. Masten, Thomas C. Ogloza, Bryan S. Berggren, Michael K. L. Man, Keshav M. Dani, Jinyu Liu, Zhiqiang Mao, D. D. Klug, Adebayo A. Adeleke, Yansun Yao

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanNational Research Council Canada
FundersLouisiana Board of RegentsOffice of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDirac (video compression format)PhysicsPhononDispersion (optics)GrapheneSemimetalUltrashort pulseFermionBand gapCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

${\mathrm{SrMnSb}}_{2}$ is a candidate Dirac semimetal whose electrons near the $Y$ point have the linear dispersion and low mass of a Dirac cone. Here we demonstrate that ultrafast, 800-nm optical pulses can launch coherent phonon oscillations in ${\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.94}{\mathrm{Mn}}_{0.92}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{2}$, particularly an ${A}_{g}$ mode at 4.4 THz. Through first-principles calculations of the electronic and phononic structure of ${\mathrm{SrMnSb}}_{2}$, we show that high-amplitude oscillations of this mode would displace the atoms in a way that transiently opens and closes a gap at the node of the Dirac cone. The ability to control the nodal gap on a subpicosecond timescale could create opportunities for the design and manipulation of Dirac fermions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207