Oscillation Frequency <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$LC$ </tex-math> </inline-formula>-Based Sensor for Characterizing Two-Phase Flows in Energy Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need for two-phase flow measurement in the power generation industry has been significantly increased over the last few years. This is mainly because the reliable measurements of the two-phase flow parameters, such as void fraction, phase velocity, and flow pattern identification, are important for accurate modeling and/or in the operation of energy systems. Although many two-phase flow sensors were recently developed, challenges in measuring two-phase flow characteristics using a simple and inexpensive sensor remain unresolved. Therefore, extensive research efforts that were spent in designing accurate two-phase flow sensor that does not require complex software solving an inverse problem are currently under development worldwide. In this paper, a multichannel, high-resolution capacitance sensor system for two-phase flow void fraction measurements was developed for slightly conductive and non-conductive fluids. Inductance-capacitance (LC) metering circuit is designed to relate the change in the measured resonance frequency to the change in capacitance registered by the sensor. The narrow band filtering effect of the LC circuit allows for the system to be more resistant to background noise. Three sensor electrode configurations were designed in order to provide more information on the flow behavior in the piping system, including the bubble velocity, flow distribution, and time signal of void fraction for different flow patterns. Both static and dynamic measurements were carried out, and the sensor operation was validated using a high-speed imaging system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".