MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897222118 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.271

Regulation of soil moisture using zone model predictive control

2018· article· en· W2897222118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Range (aeronautics)Nonlinear systemWater contentController (irrigation)Environmental scienceMoistureComputer scienceControl (management)EngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns the input-output model identification and zone model predictive control of an agro-hydrological system modeled by a partial differential equation. The primary control objective is to maintain the soil moisture within a desired range which is suitable for grass grow. There is also a secondary control objective which is to reduce the total irrigation amount. First, a linear parameter varying (LPV) model is identified for controller design purpose using a maximum likelihood gradient-based iterative estimation method. Then, based on the LPV model, a zone model predictive control (MPC) is designed which uses an output disturbance and state observer to reduce model-plant mismatch and an asymmetric target zone to reduce irrigation amount under weather uncertainties while maintaining the soil moisture within the target range. Simulation studies show that the LPV model is a good approximation of the original nonlinear model and effectively reduces the online computational load of the MPC, and that the proposed zone MPC can lead to significant water conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it