MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897229744 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.589

Application of Model Reference Adaptive PI Control to FTCC of a Wind Farm

2018· article· en· W2897229744 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamed Badihi, Saeedreza Jadidi, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsWind powerOffshore wind powerIcingReliability (semiconductor)Scheme (mathematics)Reliability engineeringBenchmark (surveying)TurbineWind speedFault (geology)Computer scienceControl (management)Marine engineeringEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)MeteorologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High reliability and availability are crucial for cost-effective operation of any wind farm. In this regard, effective schemes for fault detection, diagnosis and accommodation need to be developed to improve the reliability and availability of wind turbines and consequently wind farms (groups of wind turbines). To address this issue, this paper employs an adaptive proportional-integral (PI) control approach in a cooperative framework that is oriented to the design and development of a novel fault-tolerant cooperative control (FTCC) scheme in a wind farm. Applied to a wind farm, this scheme handles decreased power generation faults that may be caused by icing or debris build-up on the blades over time. Different simulations on a high-fidelity offshore wind farm benchmark show the effectiveness and satisfactory performance of the proposed scheme in the presence of wind turbulences, measurement noises and realistic fault scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207