MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897235318 · doi:10.1103/physreve.98.043202

Ray-based modeling of cross-beam energy transfer at caustics

2018· article· en· W2897235318 on OpenAlex
R. K. Follett, J. G. Shaw, J. F. Myatt, V. N. Goncharov, D. H. Edgell, D. H. Froula, J. P. Palastro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Nuclear Security AdministrationDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsUniversity of RochesterNew York State Energy Research and Development AuthorityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsImplosionInertial confinement fusionPhysicsLaserRadiationComputational physicsOpticsPlasmaBeam (structure)DiscretizationNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) is a laser-plasma instability that significantly impacts laser energy deposition in laser-driven inertial confinement fusion (ICF) experiments. Radiation-hydrodynamics simulations, which are used to design and tune ICF implosions, use ray-based CBET models, but existing models require artificial multipliers to conserve energy and to obtain quantitative agreement with experiments. The discretization of the ray trajectories in traditional ray-based CBET models does not account for the rapid variation in CBET gain as rays pass through caustics. We introduce a model that allows one to treat caustics much more accurately and greatly improves energy conservation. The ray-based CBET calculations show excellent agreement with laser absorption from two-dimensional wave-based calculations (0.3% difference) and a three-dimensional 60-beam OMEGA implosion (2.4% difference) without artificial multipliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it