La figure de l’enseignant intellectuel chez Hannah Arendt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à contraster le modèle que nous qualifions d’« enseignant intellectuel », tel que développé par Hannah Arendt dans La Crise de l’éducation (1958), aux figures enseignantes découlant des programmes éducatifs québécois des années 1960-1970, 1980-1990 et 2000. Comment l’enseignant intellectuel arendtien se mesure-t-il aux présupposés philosophiques de ces programmes et des modèles du maître qu’ils ont sous-tendus ou explicitement proposés ? Comment La Crise de l’éducation nous permet-il d’analyser, de façon critique, les modèles de l’enseignant-accompagnateur du Rapport Parent de 1963, de l’enseignant-technicien des programmes de 1980 et de l’enseignant professionnel du renouveau pédagogique des années 2000 ? Telles sont quelques-unes des questions aux fondements de cet article, dont l’objectif principal est d’actualiser la force de la pensée arendtienne pour une analyse philosophico-historique du statut et du rôle de l’enseignant québécois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".