MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897263208 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.165430

Perfect and imperfect conductance quantization and transport resonances of two-dimensional topological-insulator quantum dots with normal conducting leads and contacts

2018· article· en· W2897263208 on OpenAlexafffund
George Kirczenow

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsConductancePhysicsCondensed matter physicsTopological insulatorQuantization (signal processing)Insulator (electricity)Topology (electrical circuits)Ohmic contactConductorFermi energyElectronQuantumFermi levelQuantum dotQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A minimal tight-binding model of the two-dimensional topological-insulator bismuthene on SiC that accurately describes its experimentally determined low-energy electronic band structure is presented. Two-terminal electron transport through quantum dots described by this model with Ohmic normal conductor contacts and leads is studied within Landauer theory. Depending on the configuration of the leads and contacts, quantized conductances exactly or approximately equal to the conductance quantum $2{e}^{2}/h$, or conductance resonances are found at zero temperature if the Fermi level is within the topological-insulator bulk band gap. Interface states formed at the normal contact--topological-insulator boundary and their role in electron transport are discussed. Disorder along the normal contact--topological-insulator interfaces is found to improve the accuracy of the conductance quantization due to Anderson localization of the interface states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207