Koncepcja les espaces sociaux localisés w badaniach struktury społecznej wsi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research on social structure of rural areas in Poland have been carried for over one hundred years. Nowadays it is carried according to the methods of general sociology and shows the full diversity of professions of people living in the countryside. More than the half of them are workers, whereas farmers and representatives of a new middle class account each for about a quarter. These ratios are, however, not the same in different regions and have their influence on the character of the social milieu of individuals, the so-called context effect. If the influence of the latter is to be observed, various milieus (contexts) have to be defined and localised. Testing the possibility of such an operation using the idea of les espaces sociaux localisés by Gilles Laferté is the subject of the paper. Four types of rural social structure are distinguished: agricultural, workers’, intelligentsia-workers, and mixed; they are characterised and localised spatially. Conducted empirical research is the basis of showing the influence of the social context on behaviour and self-appraisal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".