Cognitive functions and vegetative regulation in practically healthy young persons with different health status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. To study the level of cognitive functions and peculiarities of vegetative regulation in practically healthy young persons.
 Materials and methods. The study included 116 practically healthy persons of young age (23,06 ± 2,3), 81 women and 35 men. They were divided into five groups of health according to G.L. Apanasenko; in all the groups of comparison, the following was assessed: vegetative regulation using cardiointervalography, cognitive functions – with Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale.
 Results. Variety of reliable differences among the obtained data permits to consider the principles of vegetative regulation formation and cognitive disorder manifestations in different groups. The scheme, reflecting the depen-dence of manifestation of the studied indices in the comparison groups, was offered as a visual confirmation.
 Conclusions. The optimal level of providing cognitive functions in practically healthy young persons was shown to be reached by the balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic effects, more typical for subjects, corresponding to moderate health status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".