Characterisation of a subaqueously deposited silt iron ore tailings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A geotechnical investigation was carried out to characterise a subaqueously deposited, primarily silt, iron ore tailings. Piezocone penetration tests (CPTu) were carried out followed by piston tube sampling at a selected target depth. Piston samples provided measures of in situ density (by means of gravimetric water content), and supplied material for reconstituted and intact laboratory testing. Reconstituted samples prepared using moist tamping (MT) for determination of the critical state locus (CSL), along with intact specimens, were both tested. The potential existence of layering within the recovered specimens was also assessed, indicating near-homogenous samples. The laboratory testing of intact specimens suggested that they appeared to tend towards the same CSL as that obtained from reconstituted loose MT specimens. This tentative result differs from some previous comparisons – with the agreement seen in this case being suggested to primarily result from a lack of layering. In situ state as inferred from both CPTu data and comparison of tube densities to the CSL suggested a loose state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".