MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897360197 · doi:10.1007/s10705-018-9956-0

Critical plant and soil phosphorus for wheat, maize, and rapeseed after 44 years of P fertilization

2018· article· en· W2897360197 on OpenAlexaff
Selma Cadot, Gilles Bélanger, Noura Ziadi, Christian Morel, Sokrat Sinaj

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgroscope
KeywordsAgronomyShootRapeseedHuman fertilizationPhosphorusFertilizerBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorus (P) crop fertilization requires optimal management to avoid the waste of a non-renewable resource and water pollution, but current methods for assessing soil phyto-available P and plant P requirements are not sufficiently precise to meet this goal. The objectives of the present study were to (1) evaluate the effect of long-term P fertilization on the grain yield of winter wheat, maize, and rapeseed, (2) validate or establish models of critical shoot P concentration (P C ) based on relationships of shoot P concentration with either shoot biomass or shoot nitrogen (N) concentration, and (3) assess both plant-based and soil-based diagnostic tools for managing P fertilization. A long-term field experiment with contrasted P fertilizer treatments, established in 1971 by Agroscope in Changins (Switzerland), was used to measure the shoot biomass and P concentration of winter wheat in 2011, maize in 2012, and rapeseed in 2014 weekly during the growing period and the grain yield at harvest. Soil available P in the 0–0.20 m soil layer was assessed by three chemical extractions: ammonium acetate EDTA (P-AAE), sodium bicarbonate (P-NaHCO 3 ), and CO 2 -saturated water (P-CO 2 ). Long-term P fertilization increased soil available P extracted by P-CO 2 (+ 24%), P-AAE (+ 200%), and P-NaHCO 3 (+ 155%), shoot growth and grain yield by 8.4% and 26.2% for winter wheat and rapeseed respectively but had no effect on maize. The relationships between P C and shoot biomass or N concentration were described respectively by allometric and linear models (R 2 > 0.85, n = 21, 28 and 32 for winter wheat, maize and rapeseed respectively; slope P values for linear models < 0.05). The P C –shoot N concentration model ( slope : 0.083, intercept : 0.88) for winter wheat confirmed results from previous studies and can be used for calculating the P nutrition index. For the three soil available P indicators, threshold values needed to achieve 95% of the maximum yield for the three crops were less than those currently used in the official fertilization guidelines in Switzerland. Our results obtained after 44 years of contrasted P fertilization confirm the relationship between P C and shoot N concentration for grain crops and the need to revise P fertilizer recommendations based on currently used soil P tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrient Cycling in AgroecosystemsSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207