Genetic variation and population structure among larval<i>Lethenteron</i>spp. within the Yukon River drainage, Alaska
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absence of information on genetic variation and population structure of lampreysLethenteronspp. in the eastern part of their distribution limits our understanding of the migration ecology and spatial population genetic structure of the species. We examined genetic variation within and among three aggregations ofLethenteronspp. larvae in the Yukon River drainage, Alaska, using microsatellite genotypes. A total of 120 larval lampreys were genotyped at eight microsatellite loci. GlobalFSTwas 0.053 (95% CI 0.021–0.086), while pairwiseFSTvalues ranged from 0.048–0.057. Model‐based Bayesian clustering analyses with sample locality priors (LOCPRIOR) identified three distinct, but admixed, genetic clusters that corresponded with the three aggregations. Estimates of contemporary gene flow indicate substantial reciprocal migration among sites consistent with no or low‐fidelity natal homing. These results are largely in agreement with previous reports of historic and contemporary gene flow amongLethenteronspp. in other parts of their geographic distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".