MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897394190 · doi:10.1002/lob.10274

Prairie Lakes: Model Systems for Integrating Ecology and Human Dimensions for Better Management

2018· article· en· W2897394190 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lushani Nanayakkara

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultitudeDisciplineTask (project management)EcologyEnvironmental resource managementKey (lock)Ecological systems theoryEcosystemGeographyEnvironmental sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringSociologyBiologySystems engineeringSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Successfully managing the impacts of changing environmental conditions on complex socio‐ecological systems requires identifying, quantifying, and understanding the multitude of threats facing such systems. Research that transcends disciplinary boundaries is the best means of accomplishing this task. This article discusses key findings of previous studies conducted in the prairie region of Saskatchewan, Canada, the multitude of threats facing lake ecosystems, and the need to consider human dimensions to effectively address these issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography BulletinSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207