MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2897418094 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00581.2018

Information theory to tachycardia therapy: electrogram entropy predicts diastolic microstructure of reentrant ventricular tachycardia

2018· article· en· W2897418094 on OpenAlexaff
Sachin Nayyar, Eugene Downar, Mohammadali Beheshti, Timothy Liang, Stéphane Massé, Karl Magtibay, Abhishek Bhaskaran, Yawer Saeed, Edward J. Vigmond, Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineVentricular tachycardiaReentrancyMedicineTachycardiaDiastoleCondensed matter physicsBlood pressurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no known strategy to differentiate which multicomponent electrograms in sinus rhythm maintain reentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT). Low entropy in the voltage breakdown of a multicomponent electrogram can localize conditions suitable for reentry but has not been validated against the classic VT activation mapping. We examined whether low entropy in a late and diversely activated ventricular scar region characterizes and differentiates the diastolic path of VT and represents protected tissue channels devoid of side branches. Intraoperative bipolar electrogram (BiEGM) activation and entropy maps were obtained during sinus rhythm in 17 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and compared with diastolic activation paths of VT (total of 39 VTs). Mathematical modeling of a zigzag main channel with side branches was also used to further validate structural representation of low entropy in the ventricular scar. A median of one region per patient (range: 1–2 regions) was identified in sinus rhythm, in which BiEGMwith the latest mean activation time and adjacent minimum entropy were assembled together in a high-activation dispersion region. These regions accurately recognized diastolic paths of 34 VTs, often to multiple inducible VTs within a single individual arrhythmogenic region. In mathematical modeling, side branching from the main channel had a strong influence on the BiEGMcomposition along the main channel. The BiEGMobtained from a long unbranched channel had the lowest entropy compared with those with multiple side branches. In conclusion, among a population of multicomponent sinus electrograms, those that demonstrate low entropy and are delayed colocalize to critical long-protected channels of VT. This information is pertinent for planning VT ablation in sinus rhythm. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Entropy is a measure to quantify breakdown in information. Electrograms from a protected tissue channel can only possess a few states in their voltage and thus less information. In contrast, current-load interactions from side branches in unprotected channels introduce a number of dissimilar voltage deflections and thus high information. We compare here a mapping approach based on entropy against a rigorous reference standard of activation mapping during VT and entropy was assessed in sinus rhythm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→