MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897430850 · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2873520

Velocity Synchronous Linear Chirplet Transform

2018· article· en· W2897430850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTime–frequency analysisComputer scienceChirpSIGNAL (programming language)KurtosisInstantaneous phaseFrequency modulationVibrationAcousticsSignal processingAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysicsStatisticsOpticsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linear transform has been widely used in time-frequency analysis of rotational machine vibration. However, the linear transform and its variants in current forms cannot be used to reliably analyze rotational machinery vibration signals under nonstationary conditions because of their smear effect and limited time variability in time-frequency resolution. As such, this paper proposes a new time-frequency method, named velocity synchronous linear chirplet transform (VSLCT). The proposed VSLCT is an extended version of the current linear transform. It can effectively alleviate the smear effect and can dynamically provide desirable time-frequency resolution in response to condition variations. The smearing problem is resolved by using linear chirplet bases with frequencies synchronous with shaft rotational velocity, and the time-frequency resolution is made responsive to signal condition changes using time-varying window lengths. To successfully implement the VSLCT, a kurtosis-guided approach is proposed to dynamically determine the two time-varying parameters, i.e., window length and normalized angle. Therefore, the VSLCT does not require the user to provide such parameters and hence avoids the subjectivity and bias of human judgment that is often time-consuming and knowledge-demanding. This method can also analyze normal monocomponent frequency-modulated signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it