MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897440829 · doi:10.1002/qre.2412

Monitoring the ratio of two normal variables using variable sampling interval exponentially weighted moving average control charts

2018· article· en· W2897440829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality and Reliability Engineering International · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEWMA chartControl chartStatisticsX-bar chartInterval (graph theory)ChartControl limitsMathematicsSampling intervalStatistical process controlSampling (signal processing)Variable (mathematics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate in this paper a new type of control chart called VSI EWMA‐RZ by integrating the variable sampling interval feature (VSI) with the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) scheme to monitor the ratio of two normal random variables. Because the distribution of the ratio is skewed, we suggest designing two separated one‐sided charts instead of one two‐sided chart. A new coefficient is introduced allowing us to be free to choose a sampling interval provided that it optimizes the performance of the control chart. We also make a direct comparison between the VSI EWMA‐RZ charts and standard EWMA‐RZ control charts. The numerical simulations show that the proposed charts outperform the standard EWMA charts in detecting process shifts. An application is illustrated for the implementation of the VSI EWMA‐RZ control charts in the food industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it