MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897473832 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.7972

9. Quand éthique et loi se confrontent

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2897473832 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Normandeau

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychology of Social Influence
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le point de vue que je propose ici est celui d’une chercheure du domaine psychosocial dont les travaux sont réalisés notamment auprès des enfants, des adolescents et de leurs parents. Plusieurs principes éthiques sont sous-jacents au développement d’un projet de recherche et guident nos décisions de chercheurs à chacune des étapes de réalisation de nos projets de recherche. En effet, les recherches que nous conduisons se fondent sur le respect des participants à chacune des étapes du processu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.030
Scholarly communication0.0100.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicPsychology of Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207