MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 17571: Use of Goal Directed Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Arresting Patient

2015· article· en· W2897531195 on OpenAlexaff
Ahsan Shoeb, Robert Arntfield

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)ResuscitationEmergency departmentIntensive carePsychological interventionMedical emergencyPoint of care ultrasoundCardiopulmonary resuscitationIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With outcomes from cardiac arrest remaining generally poor, there is an urgency to evaluate interventions that allow physicians to manage cardiac arrest more effectively. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used at the point of care in a goal-directed manner and can rapidly provide a flurry of data on cardiac structure and function. TEE in the arrested patient is unobtrusive to resuscitation and can provide vital information regarding the potential etiology of arrest, guidance of certain procedures and prognosis. As such, some centers, including our own, have adopted increasingly routine use of TEE in this context. Given the paucity of data in this area, we sought to examine the influence of point-of-care TEE conducted by emergency physicians or intensivists at our institution for patients in or immediately after cardiac arrest. Methods: Goal-directed TEE in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care units (ICU) and their reports were archived in a dedicated point-of-care ultrasound imaging database. We conducted a search of all TEE examinations archived between December 2012 and April 2015 in the peri-arrest period (in or immediately after cardiac arrest). The details from reports were abstracted. TEE-directed management changes were noted when recommendation(s) regarding initiation/escalation of inotropes, fluid administration, termination of resuscitation or surgical procedure were featured in the TEE report. Results: A total of 57 peri-arrest TEE exams were identified (21 in ICUs and 36 in EDs). Goal-directed TEE changed management in 61.4% of cases. TEE facilitated the escalation/initiation of inotropes (35.3%), decision to terminate resuscitation (32.4%), guided fluid management (23.5%) and surgical procedures (8.8%). TEE studies altered management in 66.7% of cases in the Intensive Care Unit and in 58.3% of cases in the Emergency Department. Conclusions: Goal-directed TEE performed by emergency physicians or intensivists has an impact on management on patients in the peri-arrest setting the majority of the time. Given the lack of reliable diagnostic and therapeutic options in arresting patients, a larger study examining the influence of goal-directed TEE on patient outcomes in cardiac arrest should be carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→