MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897552438

William Lyon Mackenzie King : a New Era of Canadian relations with Europe

2009· book-chapter· en· W2897552438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tomasz Soroka

Bibliographic record

VenueHomo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsArt historyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the Prime Minister Mackenzie King’s personal convictions and philosophy referring to Canadian relations with Britain and with Europe in general. It attempts to explain the reasons of Mackenzie King’s anti-Imperial and anti-European attitude through analysis of the excerpts of his biography, diaries and parliamentary speeches. The article shows the tremendous influence Mackenzie King’s personality and his own beliefs had on Canadian foreign policy, Imperial relations and how his view of Canada’s independent diplomacy shaped a new era of Canadian-European relations and contributed to the recognition of Canada abroad. The article concentrates on the selected political and historical events (the Statute of Westminster of 1931 in particular) that loosened the ties between Canada and Britain. In particular the emphasis is put on these changes in the bilateral Canadian-British relations and these actions and decisions undertaken by Mackenzie King or his administration that changed the Canadian government’s approach to European affairs and reshaped both the perception of Europe in Canada and the perception of Canada in Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0190.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHomo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207