Quais os interesses e as motivações para a busca de cursos de graduação através do sistema semipresencial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo O presente estudo objetivou discutir os “Interesses e as motivacoes para a procura de um curso de Educacao a Distância (EaD)”. Tal pesquisa foi realizada com os alunos do Curso Semipresencial de “Licenciatura em Ciencias” oferecido pela Universidade de Sao Paulo – USP, em parceria com a Universidade Virtual do Estado de Sao Paulo – UNIVESP, por meio de questionarios disponiveis no ambiente virtual de aprendizagem. Visto que o objetivo principal do curso em questao e a formacao de professores para atuar no Ensino Fundamental, o questionario buscou recolher dados sobre a profissao docente e perspectivas profissionais, qual a possivel satisfacao e expectativa dos alunos do Curso Licenciatura em Ciencias, e o interesse na continuidade dos estudos. Os principais resultados apontaram que o curso atingiu os objetivos propostos, principalmente no que se refere a formacao de professores que queiram atuar no Ensino Fundamental, garantindo para tal uma formacao de qualidade. O estudo ampliou as discussoes a respeito da motivacao na procura pelo curso na modalidade a distância, sua eficacia e aplicabilidade de estrategias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".