Evolutionary Prediction of Biohydrogen Production by Dark Fermentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work is a study of the performance and effect of operational parameters on biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent by dark fermentation in batch mode. The process parameters examined are pH (5, 5.5, and 6), temperature (30, 35, and 40 °C), substrate concentration (5000, 12 500, and 20 000 mg L −1 ) and inoculum volume (20, 25, and 30 mL). The inoculum concentration prepared was 10 000 mg L −1 volatile suspended solids. The experiments were designed by response surface methodology (RSM). The highest chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, hydrogen percentage (H 2 %) and hydrogen yield (HY) obtained were 58.3%, 80%, and 4.83 mol H 2 /mole of COD consumed, respectively. Based on the experimental data obtained with the RSM design, gene expression programming (GEP) was developed to predict the COD removal, hydrogen production, and hydrogen yield as process responses. The projected models were assessed based on the correlation coefficient ( R 2 ), root mean square error, mean absolute relative error, scatter index, and BIAS. The results demonstrate that the GEP model outperformed the RSM model and was superior in predicting the response variables. Partial derivative sensitivity analysis was also employed to assess the effect of each variable on COD%, H 2 %, and HY prediction. The prediction uncertainty for COD%, H 2 %, and HY was quantified, and the results were ±0.11, ±0.17, and 0.015, respectively. According to the results, the GEP model is more efficient than the RSM model in predicting the experimental data for biological hydrogen production in the dark fermentation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".