MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897617458 · doi:10.5539/jas.v10n11p149

Visual Symptoms of Water and Nitrogen Deficiency in Leaves of Clove Basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.)

2018· article· en· W2897617458 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Crisálida Machado Vilanova, Kátia Pereira Coelho, Tássio Rômulo Silva Araújo Luz, Daniella Patrícia Brandão Silveira, Denise Fernandes Coutinho, Emanoel Gomes de Moura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcimum gratissimumIrrigationChlorosisHorticultureLamiaceaeAcclimatizationAbscissionBiologyHuman fertilizationOcimumNitrogenBasilicumBotanyAgronomyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocimum gratissimum L. (clove basil) is an annual herb of the Lamiaceae family, widely cultivated as a plant used in cooking and medicine worldwide. There is no information on the visual symptoms of the effects of greater or lesser water irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the leaves of this species. There is no information on the visual symptoms of the effects of greater or lesser water irrigation and nitrogen fertilization (N) on the leaves of this species. The effects of different water application rates, 60% (I60), 70% (I70), 80% (I80), 90% (I90), 100% (I100) and 110% (I110) of field capacity (FC), and nitrogen fertilization, 0 (N0), 40 (N2), 80 (N4) and 160 (N8) kg of nitrogen/ha, on the leaves of this species were studied. The experiment was carried out for 60 days in a greenhouse in a completely randomised design with three replicates. Water stress was determinant for the appearance of leaves with wilted and stains. Symptoms of necrosis, apical necrosis, abscission and chlorosis were correlated only with N stress. This study suggests that the leaves of Ocimum gratissimum present better acclimatization with irrigation above the field capacity associated with high dose of N (I110N8) and that satisfactorily support the reduction of up to 70% FC with the use of 40 kg of N/ha in their production without presenting any visual symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207