MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897651186

TiZir reports titanium slag output decline in Q1, forecasts rising minsands prices

2018· article· en· W2897651186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cameron Perks

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTonneQuarter (Canadian coin)IlmeniteAgricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringEconomicsGeographyMineralogyGeologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mineral sands producer TiZir has announced a 33% year-on-year drop in output in the first quarter of 2018. The Norway-based company attributed the fall to “an unscheduled maintenance outage of the pre-reduction kiln stemming from a gearbox failure.” The company produced 34,000 tonnes of titanium slag and sold 36,600 tonnes in the first quarter, compared with 50,700 tonnes and 62,100 tonnes respectively in the fourth quarter of 2017. At the company’s Grande Cote mineral sands operation (GCO) in Senegal, West Africa, a drop in finished goods production was created primarily by a reduction in ilmenite volumes. These fell to 104,104 tonnes in the first quarter of 2018 from 126,298 tonnes in the last quarter of 2017. Production of zircon in the first quarter declined slightly to 15,805 tonnes from 16,400 tonnes in the previous quarter, but sales increased to 17,906 tonnes from 17,614 tonnes in the same comparison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207