MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897651186

TiZir reports titanium slag output decline in Q1, forecasts rising minsands prices

2018· article· en· W2897651186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTonneQuarter (Canadian coin)IlmeniteAgricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringEconomicsGeographyMineralogyGeologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mineral sands producer TiZir has announced a 33% year-on-year drop in output in the first quarter of 2018. The Norway-based company attributed the fall to “an unscheduled maintenance outage of the pre-reduction kiln stemming from a gearbox failure.” The company produced 34,000 tonnes of titanium slag and sold 36,600 tonnes in the first quarter, compared with 50,700 tonnes and 62,100 tonnes respectively in the fourth quarter of 2017. At the company’s Grande Cote mineral sands operation (GCO) in Senegal, West Africa, a drop in finished goods production was created primarily by a reduction in ilmenite volumes. These fell to 104,104 tonnes in the first quarter of 2018 from 126,298 tonnes in the last quarter of 2017. Production of zircon in the first quarter declined slightly to 15,805 tonnes from 16,400 tonnes in the previous quarter, but sales increased to 17,906 tonnes from 17,614 tonnes in the same comparison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it