MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897750073 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003801

Impact of mobile health interventions during the perinatal period for mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

2018· review· en· W2897750073 on OpenAlexafffund
Justine Dol, Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, Gail Tomblin Murphy, Megan Aston, Douglas McMillan, Brianna Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPsychological interventionmHealthLow and middle income countriesPerinatal periodMedicineLow incomeProtocol (science)PregnancyDeveloping countryNursingAlternative medicineEconomic growthSocioeconomicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEW QUESTION: The objective of this review is to determine the impact of mother-targeted mobile health (mHealth) education interventions available during the perinatal period in low- and middle-income countries on maternal and newborn outcomes. Thus, the review questions are: what is the impact of mother-targeted mHealth education interventions on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.018
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.434 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation ReportsSame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207