MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897797272 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1800060

Dynamic Spectrum Management through Resource Virtualization with M2M Communications

2018· article· en· W2897797272 on OpenAlexaff
Abdallah Moubayed, Karim Hammad, Abdallah Sham, Hanan Lutfiyya

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWirelessVirtualizationQuality of serviceRadio resource managementSpectrum managementWireless networkDistributed computingCognitive radioTelecommunicationsCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless spectrum licensing has increased due to the continuous evolution and use of cellular technology. The increase in the number of mobile-connected devices and global data traffic demand has led to a significant increase in demand for spectrum access with studies showing that there is unexploited capacity in the spectrum. This is especially critical for 5G networks where the service requirements are extremely stringent. To that end, this article proposes dynamic spectrum management through the combination of two innovative architectures, wireless resource virtualization (WRV) and machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. WRV allows for better utilization of the spectrum, while reducing both the capital and operational expenditures. On the other hand, M2M communications can help boost capacity and improve quality of service by leveraging spectrum access across multiple radio technologies. In this article, a brief discussion of multi-radio access technology heterogeneous networks is given. Then the problem of dynamic spectrum management through resource virtualization with M2M communications is described. To the best of our knowledge, such a combined framework has not been previously proposed. Two different algorithms are proposed to evaluate the performance of the considered architecture, namely a decomposition- based algorithm and a greedy-based algorithm. Simulation results show that such architecture can boost the overall capacity of the system by achieving higher data rates. Moreover, it is shown that the number of possibly supported M2M pairs is increased while using the same spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207