MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897809048 · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1133

Indigenous Nursing Students’ Readiness for Practice Perceptions

2018· article· en· W2897809048 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Noelle Rohatinsky, Heather Exner-Pirot, Michèle Parent-Bergeron, Kristopher Bosevski, Carrie Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousNursingHonorPerceptionNurse educationCommissionNursing practiceHealth carePsychologyMedical educationMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Despite being well prepared by baccalaureate nursing institutions, senior students often express trepidation and a lack of confidence with respect to their upcoming nursing role. The literature has long explored readiness for practice struggles of new graduate nurses, however, no studies of which we are aware have addressed Indigenous senior nursing students’ perspectives on this topic. By understanding the readiness for practice perceptions of Indigenous nursing students and facilitating the successful transition from student to nurse, nursing education programs can honor the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s (2015) Calls to Action related to a) increasing the number of Indigenous professionals working in the health care field, and b) ensuring the retention of Indigenous healthcare providers in Indigenous communities. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to explore baccalaureate Indigenous nursing students’ perceptions of their readiness for practice. Procedures: A descriptive exploratory study was conducted with a convenience sample of 26 senior baccalaureate nursing students in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada using the Readiness for Practice Survey. Results: Readiness for practice perceptions of Indigenous nursing students in this study are similar when compared with nursing students from the extant literature. With regards to Indigenous students’ perceived clinical problem solving skills they believed they used evidence to make clinical decisions and they were confident in their ability to problem solve. They also felt confident identifying actual or potential safety risk to patients. Students were least comfortable knowing what to do for a dying patient. When considering student learning perspectives, students believed simulation activities assisted them in being prepared for clinical practice. The least effective learning strategy they perceived was reflective journal writing. The majority of participants were satisfied in choosing nursing as a career, however, they were less confident in their readiness for entering the nursing profession. Students were comfortable asking for help and communicating with patients and family members. Participants did not feel overwhelmed with ethical issues and believed they had opportunities to practice skills more than once. Participants specified the nursing skills they were most uncomfortable performing were electrocardiogram or telemetry monitoring and interpretation, responding to an emergency or code blue, and performing tracheostomy care and suctioning. Students indicated their level of comfort in caring for two, three, and four patients and students became less confident as the number of patients they cared for increased. When asked what could have been done to help students feel more prepared to enter the nursing profession, participants had several suggestions including additional anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and medical surgical theory courses particularly in upper years of the program, increased clinical hours, opportunities to practice psychomotor skills, and opportunities for mentorship both within school and after graduation. Conclusion: The results of the study provide insight into Indigenous students’ readiness for practice experiences and provides knowledge on supports needed to assist graduates’ transitions into their nursing careers. Strategies to enhance Indigenous nurse readiness for practice can assist in creating a representative workforce and ultimately provide culturally safe, quality care for Indigenous individuals and communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.438 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmièreSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207