Socioeconomic inequalities in exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in children in Israel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in infants and children causes more frequent and severe asthma attacks, respiratory infections, ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. The aim of this study was to measure ETS exposure in children in Israel (ages 4-11 years) using urinary cotinine measurements, in order to compare exposure levels to other international populations, and to assess predictors of ETS exposure in children in Israel. METHODS: A subset of children who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Survey (RAV- MABAT) in 2015-2016 were invited to participate in the Second Israel Biomonitoring Survey. We analyzed urinary cotinine and creatinine concentrations in 103 children. Parents of study participants were interviewed in person on children's exposure to ETS at home and in other environments and on sociodemographic variables. We calculated creatinine-adjusted and unadjusted urinary cotinine geometric means in children and analyzed associations in univariable and multivariable analyses, between sociodemographic variables and parental - reported exposure, and urinary cotinine concentrations. RESULTS: Based on urinary creatinine measurement, over 60% of children are exposed to ETS (compared to <40% based on parental report). Linear regression showed a positive association between urinary cotinine concentration and reported ETS exposure (p = 0.001). Mean cotinine concentration among children whose parents reported that they are exposed to ETS at home (5.1 μg/l) was significantly higher than the concentration among children whose parents reported they are not exposed to ETS at home (1.6 μg/l, p < 0.001). There was an inverse relationship between total family income and urinary cotinine concentration (p < 0.05). In a multivariable model adjusted for ethnicity and other factors, family income was a significant predictor of urinary cotinine level (p = 0.04, slope = -0.49). Geometric mean creatinine adjusted concentrations in children in the current study were higher than in children in Canada and selected European countries. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of widespread exposure to ETS in children in the study. There is an urgent need to protect children in Israel from exposure to ETS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".