MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897880144

Rural Non-farm Employment in Ghana in an Era of Structural Transformation: Prevalence, Determinants, and Implications for Well-being

2018· article· en· W2897880144 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Harry A. Sackey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman capitalGeographyWelfare economicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data from recent nationally representative living standards surveys in Ghana, this study examines non-farm employment in rural Ghana. The data suggest an increase in rural non-farm employment over a seven-year period, with females outpacing males in that sector. The main factors driving the likelihood of non-farm employment include human capital, household financial resources, infrastructure availability and non-ownership of land. Rural well-being is improving, and this is taking place against the backdrop of structural transformation reflected in part by an increase in non-farm employment and educational attainment. Government policies aimed at providing rural areas with electricity and accessible roads, among others, have helped to create an enabling environment for improvement in well-being. Keywords: non-farm employment, rural well-being, structural transformation, human capital --------------------------------------------------------- L'Emploi Rural Non-Agricole au Ghana a une Epoque de Transformation Structurelle: Prevalence, Facteurs decisifs et Implications pour le Bien-Etre. Resume En utilisant des donnees d'enquetes sur les conditions de vie representatives recentes a l'echelle nationale du Ghana, cette etude examine l'emploi non-agricole dans le Ghana rural. Les donnees suggerent une augmentation de l'emploi non-agricole rural sur une periode de sept ans, avec un nombre de femmes depassant celui des hommes dans ce secteur. Les principaux facteurs qui changent la probabilite de l'emploi non-agricole incluent le capital humain, les ressources financieres des menages, la disponibilite de l'infrastructure et la non possession de la terre. Le bien-etre rural s'ameliore et cela se passe avec en arriere plan les transformations structurelles refletees en partie par l'augmentation de l'emploi non-agricole et la realisation educationnelle. Les politiques gouvernementales ont eu notamment pour but de fournir les zones rurales en electricite et en routes accessibles, ce qui a aide a creer un environnement favorable a l'amelioration du bien-etre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207