Use of QuantiFERON-TB Gold to determine the aetiology of idiopathic erythema induratum: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although rare, erythema induratum is the most common entity presenting as lobular panniculitis with vasculitis. It is usually caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, although other aetiologies have been reported. We present a case of a 73-year-old male with multiple recurring tender erythematous nodules on the backs of both calves and shins. Prior to arrival in our clinic, the patient underwent a 9-month course of isoniazid with no improvement and subsequently received a diagnosis of idiopathic erythema induratum. We performed an interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold which was positive for M. tuberculosis infection. The patient was successfully treated with ethambutol 1.6 g for 1 month; pyrazinamide 2 g for 2 months; and isoniazid 300 mg, vitamin B6 25 mg, and rifampin 600 mg for 6 months. This case highlights the utility of using interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold and a multidrug regiment over isoniazid in erythema induratum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".