MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897949212 · doi:10.1080/01605682.2018.1495158

Data envelopment analysis with interactive fuzzy variables

2018· article· en· W2897949212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Operational Research Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEfficiency Analysis Using DEA
Canadian institutionsSheridan College
FundersNational Office for Philosophy and Social SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsData envelopment analysisFuzzy logicComputer scienceData miningOperations researchFuzzy numberPurchasingFuzzy set operationsFuzzy setMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we develop a novel fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, using fuzzy Choquet integral as an aggregating tool, to evaluate the efficiency of the decision making units (DMUs). The proposed model can be used to evaluate the efficiency of the DMU with interactive fuzzy variables (fuzzy inputs or fuzzy outputs), the classical fuzzy DEA model is a special form of this novel fuzzy DEA model. At the end of the article, we will use numerical examples to illustrate the performance of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it