Square-shaped Pendants «Koziivka / Nova Odesa» Language: Ukrainian
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The square pendants decorated with hemispheres in the corners and center, and rows of pressed dots pierced by a punch along the edge, with riveted ears are studied in the paper. These adornments can be joint into the group of “Koziivka / Nova Odesa” pendants type. The first type is represented on the moulds from Bernashivka and Sukha Homilsha. The second type is more numerous: these are the finds from Koziivka / Nova Odesa, Poltava (2014), Cherkasy-Konopelka and Khytsivskyi hoards on the left bank of Dnieper River, from the burial grounds Luchyste, crypt 54, layer 3, grave 16 in the Crimea and “Leninskii put” in the Ciscaucasia. The chronology of these square-shaped pendants is spread since the period of formation of the decoration of hoards of the first chronological group according to O.A. Shcheglova (second half of the 6th — middle / third quarter of the 7th century), and until the period of deposition of the hoards (second — third quarter of the 7th century). This chronology could be confirmed by the items from Luchyste burial ground: the grave 16 of crypt 54 is dated to the mid-7th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".