MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897955301 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2017-0565

Local egg production and larval losses to advection contribute to interannual and long-term variability of American lobster (<i>Homarus americanus</i>) settlement intensity

2018· article· en· W2897955301 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Louise Gendron, Denis Lefaivre, Bernard Sainte‐Marie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsHomarusAmerican lobsterJuvenilePopulationBenthic zoneLarvaBiologyFisheryEcologyOceanographyCrustaceanDemographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American lobster (Homarus americanus) egg production and settlement intensity were examined over a 19-year period (1995–2013) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence at the Magdalen Islands (MI), where the population is spatially isolated during the benthic phase. Settlement and hatch dates by year were back-calculated from observed young-of-the-year size structure and juvenile and larval growth models. Drift of locally released larvae, from stage I to the end of stage III, was simulated using an ocean circulation model. Settlement intensity was related positively to egg production and negatively to drift distance. There was a strong positive trend in settlement intensity explained largely by increasing egg production, as well as by declining larval duration and drift distance. In the last years of the study, settlement intensity may have been limited by nursery saturation. The results suggest that demographic connectivity through larval drift is highly dynamic in time and that it declined during our study period. The demographic dependence of the MI lobster population on other populations in the Gulf of St. Lawrence is probably low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207