A “DISCIPLINA” FILOSOFIA COMO PROMOTORA DO DEBATE SOBRE IGUALDADE E DIFERENÇA NO AMBIENTE ESCOLAR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo que apresentamos ao leitor é a exposição formal da memória das atividades realizadas durante o curso de aperfeiçoamento UNIAFRO daUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Todas as intervenções pedagógicas aconteceram com a primeira turma do Ensino Técnico em Eletromecânica Integrado ao Ensino Médio do Campus de Sapiranga –RS, do Instituto Federal Sul-Rio-Grandense (IFSul). Optamos por relatar o desempenho das quatro práticas em sala de aula que o curso de aperfeiçoamento propôs aos cursistas. Ante a este fato, prevenimos que se trata de texto expositivo-reflexivo e não de uma pesquisa científica rigorosa. Salientamos ainda que o êxito de todo o trabalho pedagógico aconteceu devido ao envolvimento de vários colegas professores e suas respectivas disciplinas junto com os setores de ensino, pesquisa e extensão do Campus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it