MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898053457 · doi:10.1109/eic.2018.8481041

Experience with Hydro-Generator Turn-to-Turn Insulation Fault, Investigation, and Recommendation for New Stator Winding Design and Protection

2018· article· en· W2898053457 on OpenAlexaff
Wenli Hong, Muhammud Arshad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorElectromagnetic coilGenerator (circuit theory)Turn (biochemistry)Fault (geology)EngineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The insulation failure of multi-turn coils may cause significant damage to hydro generators including both the stator winding and core. A number of stator winding faults have been occurring on hydro generators in the last ten years as result of a turn-to-turn insulation failure. The insulation failure is complex in nature and is attributed to various design and operating factors, thus making the interpretation of the turn insulation condition extremely difficult. The purpose of this paper is to provide typical cases of failure and to share the experience in investigating these turn-to-turn faults, in order to increase knowledge about turn insulation failure. The requirements of insulation design and testing for new stator winding are specified, especially turn insulation. Surge protection to reduce the turn insulation degradation is also presented as the lesson learned from these cases. Some suggestions are also made that may enable utility owners to reduce the risk of multi-turn coil winding failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207