MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898096163 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2877747

Polymer Microelectromechanical System-Integrated Flexible Sensors for Wearable Technologies

2018· article· en· W2898096163 on OpenAlexafffund
Shicheng Fan, Lingju Meng, Dan Li, Wei Zheng, Xihua Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates Bio SolutionsUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPressure sensorWearable computerPolydimethylsiloxaneMicroelectromechanical systemsFlexibility (engineering)RoboticsComputer sciencePiezoresistive effectMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyEmbedded systemEngineeringMechanical engineeringRobotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) using flexible and/or stretchable polymers can bring new functions of conformal integration of sensors on flat and curved surfaces. Here, we report flexible strain/pressure sensors using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyimide-based MEMS. The MEMS device architecture enables the integration of three electrical sensors, outputting digital signals, onto an area of 50 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> for strain and pressure detection. We show that engineered sensors with various sensitivities in bending mode can be applied to control robotic arms. Another demonstration of pressure sensing using these sensors enables the potential of pressure control in handling physical objects. Our integrated wearable flexible sensors, compared to widely used rigid sensors, derive flexibility and stretchability from polymer materials and have huge potential applications in robotics, prosthetics, and other wearable technologies requiring flexible sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207