MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898103386 · doi:10.24815/cdj.v10i1.10612

GAMBARAN EARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES (ECC) DI POSYANDU TERINTEGRASI PAUD (PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI) KECAMATAN SIJUNJUNG KABUPATEN SIJUNJUNG SUMATERA BARAT (Preliminary Study Pengembangan Surveilans ECC di Kabupaten Sijunjung Sumatera Barat pada bulan Juli 2013)

2018· article· id· W2898103386 on OpenAlexaff
Arymbi Pujiastuty

Bibliographic record

VenueCakradonya Dental Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) atau karies pada anak usia dini merupakan masalah kesehatan masyarakat yang besar dan menjadi penyakit infeksi yang kronis pada anak yang sulit dikontrol. Belum ada data yang dapat mewakili gambaran beban penyakit ECC khususnya di Sumatera Barat lebih khusus lagi di Kabupaten Sijunjung yang dapat digunakan untuk perencanaan program dalam memecahkan masalah ECC. Studi Deskriptif cross sectional ini bertujuan untuk mendapat gambaran prevalensi, pengalaman dan tingkat keparahan Early Childhood Caries (ECC) pada anak usia 3 - 6 tahun yang akan digunakan sebagai preliminary study pengembangan surveilans ECC di Kabupaten Sijunjung Sumatera Barat. Metode yang dipakai yaitu pemeriksaan klinis dengan menggunakan indeks DMFT/dmft untuk mengukur pengalaman ECC. Indeks PUFA/pufa digunakan untuk menilai adanya kondisi oral dan infeksi akibat ECC tidak terawat. Kesimpulannya adalah prevalensi ECC dan infeksi odontogenik yang didapat menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar kondisi kesehatan gigi dan mulut anak usia pra sekolah masih belum menjadi perhatian serius dan sebagian besar kasus karies pada anak usia dini (ECC) didapati belum dilakukan perawatan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCakradonya Dental JournalSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207